Doxycycline
doxycycline - doxycycline
High-Altitude Research Advances Low-Altitude Medicine: A Special Issue of Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
05 May 2010
Elsevier
High altitude medicine is a “natural research laboratory” for the study of cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology. As such, it can shed light on conditions and diseases that mimic the low oxygen content of the atmosphere at the top of mountains. Yves Allemann, MD, FESC, Swiss Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital, Bern, and Urs Scherrer, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, have assembled an international group of leading authorities to contribute to a special issue of Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases dedicated to high-altitude medicine and novel insights into disease mechanisms provided by high-altitude research.
“We have demonstrated that in recent years, the scope of high-altitude research has broadened considerably, because it has become clear that high-altitude offers a unique opportunity to study fundamental mechanisms of disease,” according to Guest Editors Allemann and Scherrer. “During the past decade, high-altitude studies have elucidated fundamental novel mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of lung edema and hypoxic pulmonary hypertension. The new knowledge generated by these high-altitude studies has already been transferred to the bedside of patients having these problems at low altitude. Second and equally important, we have shown that high-altitude exposure facilitates the detection of vascular dysfunction in humans. Capitalizing on this observation, high-altitude exposure of young apparently healthy children has allowed demonstrating fetal programming of vascular dysfunction at a very early stage. We predict that high-altitude exposure, real or simulated, will become an important tool for the detection of early vascular dysfunction in humans.”
At high altitude, lack of oxygen principally affects the respiratory, cardiovascular, neuroendocrine, and renal systems. At low altitude, the same effects may occur, not due to ambient lack of oxygen, but as the result of hypoxemia, deficient oxygenation of the blood, which is the consequence of an organ insufficiency, usually the heart or the lung.
Allemann and Scherrer observe that “the ultimate goal of most high-altitude researchers is not only to understand physiologic (mal)adaptation to hypoxia for the benefit of the millions exposing themselves to high altitude, but to think beyond that, imagining how the knowledge gained from field research at high altitude may be applied to the much larger number of patients with hypoxia/hypoxemia-associated diseases.”
The issue provides cutting-edge insight into the current state of research in the field, as well as up-to-date information on the treatment and prevention of the three major high-altitude related diseases: acute mountain sickness, high-altitude cerebral edema, and high-altitude pulmonary edema. Articles provide unique information useful to clinician-scientists interested in high-altitude medicine and advice for practicing cardiologists and family doctors who have patients suffering from cardiovascular disease planning to travel to high altitude.
For the clinician, the article by Scherrer et al demonstrates how studies at high altitude have provided important insights into fundamental mechanisms underpinning pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary edema in humans. They show how these insights have been translated into novel approaches for the treatment of patients suffering from these problems at low altitude. Finally, it provides some hints on how the natural research laboratory of high altitude may provide novel insight into cardiovascular disease mechanisms in the future.
For the practicing physician, the article by Rimoldi et al provides concise information and practical advice on how to counsel cardiovascular patients planning to travel to high altitude. There is tremendous variability in individual responses to low oxygen that may be further amplified by external factors such as exercise and stress. These responses may induce major problems in patients with cardiovascular diseases, particularly those with already limited functional reserves at low altitude.
High-altitude pulmonary edema is a life-threatening problem, and physicians need to know how to advise individuals planning high-altitude activities. The article by Maggiorini et al provides up-to-date information on how to treat and prevent this important disease.
Sometimes, a hypoxic environment is deliberately sought by endurance athletes who try to naturally augment their oxygen transport capacity. Should the athlete live high and train low or live low and train high? Vogt and Hoppeler bring together the latest concepts on that topic of debate.
Of course, for high altitude populations in the Andes, the Himalayas, or other mountainous regions around the globe, hypoxia is a natural condition of life. In an article by Stuber et al, they describe the cardiovascular adaptation mechanisms of the Bolivian Aymaras and how these differ from chronic adaptation mechanisms of Caucasians living at the same altitude. These differences and their possible positive or negative long-term consequences on cardiopulmonary health are also discussed.
Adaptation mechanisms to hypoxia can sometimes go beyond their primary goal of maintaining adequate tissue oxygenation. In chronic mountain sickness, affected patients develop, usually insidiously over time, excessive erythrocytosis, hypoxemia, and pulmonary hypertension that can have a major negative impact on quality of life. These cardiovascular consequences of chronic mountain sickness are explained by León-Velarde et al.
These articles appear in a special issue of Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, High Altitude Cardiopulmonary Physiology, Pathophysiology and Disease, Volume 52, Number 6, (May/June 2010), published by Elsevier.
With all the upsurge in health care costs, citizens that are usually not covered or haven’t any money regularly are at a loss on how to get the medications and treatment they need to have. They need a prescription program assistance program. Luckily, you can get support programs that offer citizens assistance with prescription medicine. You can now get the help with prescriptions that you need. Those programs are created with the impoverished as well as uninsured in mind. They vet people and those that meet the criteria for this system are helpedin getting prescription medicine they need for a very small charge or for free. It isn’t too difficult to qualify for the help for prescription medicine.
Who’s qualified to receive prescription drug help?
Patients which could avail of most prescription help programs have to pass a certain criteria when they submit an application. They ought to be a United states resident and lacking medication medical insurance. They also have got to meet specific income guidelines.
Conditions which have been covered by those services run the scale from emphysema to brain cancer and other chronic ailments. People with COPD, as an example, must have access to important prescription medication for instance Combivent, that is a drug that works to prevent the constriction of the airways typically observed in those individuals. The medicine is available in a metered dose inhaler and is prescribed to be inhaled three times a day.
Apart from prescription medication, one could perhaps get hold of comparable services that not only provide health care support but emotional aidas well. Companies thatmake available prosthetics, for instance artificial limbs, eyes and additional replacement parts are also intended for those who are without insurance and those who can’t afford to buy their particular prosthetics.
No matter whether you’re looking for personal medical insurance or family medical insurance, you’re sure to find a good package in Health Net. If you intend to sign up for a Health Net membership, you are able to visit their on line site or drop by the closest branch near your state. In Health Net, they hold your family’s well-being in high favor. Even as premiums may perhaps fluctuate with age, gender and county, you’ll be able to rest confident that you usually get one of the most inexpensive and complete health coverage from your Health Net plan.
Tagged: baclofen, bactrim, doctor, doxycycline, health, lipitor, medicine, penisole พฤษภาคม 6, 2010
buy generic bactrim
MIAMI — The Miami-Dade County Health Department and Florida International University will establish the first Academic Health Department in Florida.
The Miami-Dade County Health Department is planning to consolidate its administrative and program offices at FIU’s Modesto A. Maidique Campus, bringing part of its workforce to southwest Miami-Dade and forming a partnership that will strengthen the educational experience of students pursuing health careers.
An Academic Health Department is an organized partnership between schools of public health, medicine, nursing and allied health sciences with public health departments. These partnerships create dynamic academic-practice collaborations, which effectively pool the assets of all institutions involved.
The administrative and program offices of the Miami-Dade County Health Department are currently housed in eight different locations around the county, causing operational difficulties and inefficiencies, as well as logistical challenges, said Lillian Rivera, administrator of the Miami-Dade County Health Department.
“Through this partnership, we can cut costs and become a more efficient department,” Rivera said. “We also look forward to playing an important role in preparing students pursuing careers in public health and related professions to meet the 21st century challenges associated with the health needs of our population.”
The Miami-Dade County Health Department offices will be located in FIU’s Academic Health Sciences Center, which includes the Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, the Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, the College of Nursing and Health Sciences, and the College of Arts and Sciences. The Academic Health Sciences Center is expected to generate 66,000 new jobs and have an annual economic impact of more than $8.9 billion by 2025.
By consolidating administrative offices at FIU, the Miami-Dade County Health Department is expected to save the state at least $8 million over the next 25 years. The building, estimated to be 90,000 square feet, comes with an authorized budget of up to $32.5 million. The project is included within the 2010-2011 budget passed by the Florida Legislature. Pending the governor’s approval, the building will be financed through a bond and repaid through Department of Health lease payments.
The health department component of the new complex will complement a previously funded $23.3 million Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work academic facility and a new $10 million Ambulatory Care Center funded by a grant from Miami-Dade County. The clinic and academic facility are in the planning and design stages.
“We are thrilled to welcome the Miami-Dade County Health Department as our new neighbor,” said Sweetwater Mayor Manny Maroño. “By bringing well-paying jobs to our area, the new Health Department facility represents a tremendous economic boost. This is a great example of how strategic partnerships can benefit our community.”
The planned facility will increase joint teaching, research, and clinical training opportunities for FIU students, faculty and health professionals in the health department. The move also will expand opportunities for both institutions to collaborate in attracting grants that can help improve health care in the region.
The collaboration between FIU and the Miami-Dade County Health Department also has the potential to create internship opportunities through which FIU students would work with public health experts in a clinical and research environment. The facility will include a public health teaching clinic with an environmental laboratory and a nutrition/ breastfeeding program.
“This is the kind of innovative, mutually-beneficial, strategic partnership that will enhance the education of our students with real life experience,” said Fernando Treviño, dean of the Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work. “At the same time, it will improve the local state-run health facilities and save the state significant money. It’s a win-win situation.”
Media Contacts: Maydel Santana-Bravo at 305-348-1555 or Olga Connor at 786-336-1276.
-FIU-
About the Miami-Dade County Health Department:
The Miami-Dade County Health Department is part of the Florida Department of Health. The mission of the Miami-Dade County Health Department is to promote and protect the health of our community through prevention and preparedness today, for a healthier tomorrow.
About FIU:
Florida International University is one of the 25 largest universities in the nation, with nearly 40,000 students. More than 100,000 FIU alumni live and work in South Florida. Its colleges and schools offer more than 200 bachelor’s, master’s and doctoral programs in fields such as engineering, international relations and law. As one of South Florida’s anchor institutions, FIU is worlds ahead in its local and global engagement, finding solutions to the most challenging problems of our time. FIU emphasizes research as a major component of its mission. The opening of the Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine in August 2009 has enhanced the university’s ability to create lasting change through its research initiatives. For more information about FIU, visit http://www.fiu.edu.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider subscribing via email or rss to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.
- IN THE PRESS
- “A must-read blog …”
-The Wall Street Journal
- “Learn more in ten minutes than you could reading your local paper for a week.”
- Industry Insider
- - Read more…
- RECENT MENTIONS
- The New York Times
- The Washington Post
- The Economist
- ABC News
- WSJ.com
- WHYY
- THE TECH SECTION
- Healthcare, Tech and Innovation
- THCB INSIDER
- (More) Madness in Massachusetts
- The Laboratory of Democracy
- Who Is Don Berwick (And Why Is He Following Me?)
- Don Berwick: An Activist Takes the Reins at CMS
- Medicare To Cover Preventative Care
- Reform: Round 2
- We're No. 37. Or Maybe Not.
- VAT on the Horizon
- Meaningful Use In The Real World
- Healthcare's Privacy Problem (Hint: It's Not What You Think It Is)
- HEALTH 2.0
- Health 2.0 Goes to Washington. June 7th @ the Ronald Reagan Convention Center.
- Health 2.0 FAQ
- THCB ADS
HELP WANTED
Surgeons, nurses, and other medical personnel to help in Haiti
www.pih.org
IT IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT
fewer problems, happier staff, faster ROI
www.rule4consulting.com
Health 2020
Supporting Stimulus Goals with Wii Fit + Nurse Avatars + Personal Genomics
www.douglasgoldstein.com
Online Healthcare Management Degree
Rasmussen College
School of Allied Health
www.rasmussen.edu
Mesothelioma
Medical treatment information on malignant mesothelioma.
http://www.mesothelioma-aid.org/
about these links
revatio without prescription
Health care issues: Coverage responsibility for employers
October 7th, 2009 Health care issues: Coverage by employersA look at key issues in the health care debate:
THE ISSUE: Should employers be required to either provide health coverage for their workers or pay a penalty?
THE POLITICS: Millions of Americans obtain health insurance through their workplaces. But requiring all employers to offer coverage has long been a nonstarter for the business community and its Republican allies because of the financial burden it would impose.
Business owners are the happiest; getting health care for your family may be tougher in 2010
September 22nd, 2009 Happy business owners, changes in health insuranceON HAPPINESS: Business owners are the happiest Americans, according to a recent survey. Those working in manufacturing are the least satisfied.
Health Care issues: Mandated individual coverage
September 21st, 2009 Health Care issues: Mandated individual coverageA look at key issues in the health care debate:
THE ISSUE: Should every person be required to either have health care insurance or pay a penalty tax?
THE POLITICS: Requiring everyone to buy health insurance can help spread the responsibility for medical costs. With proposed subsidies to help the poor buy in, the so-called “individual mandate” gets Democrats closer to moving millions of uninsured into coverage plans.
Study shows moderate health insurance premium growth for employer-sponsored coverage
September 15th, 2009 Health insurance premiums rose modestly in 2009The cost of employer-sponsored health insurance rose modestly again this year, but researchers predict a return to bigger increases that may eventually produce crippling premiums if left unchecked. Meanwhile, more workers with single coverage are facing high-deductible plans that make them pay $1,000 or more out of pocket before coverage starts, according to a report released Tuesday by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research and Educational Trust, a nonprofit research organization affiliated with the American Hospital Association.
Obama says part of his health reform plan comes from former presidential opponent John McCain
September 9th, 2009 Obama credits McCain on health coverage planWASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is including a proposal from his Republican rival last year as part of his health care reform plan. In his Wednesday night speech to Congress, Obama said he wants to help Americans who can't get insurance because they have pre-existing medical conditions.
Obama challenges Congress: Health care at 'breaking point'
September 9th, 2009 WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama has challenged US lawmakers to end a vicious dispute over health care and approve an overhaul of the system before it is too late. Looking to regain momentum on his top domestic issue after a tumultuous summer, Obama warned in a major speech to a joint session of Congress late Wednesday that the world's costliest health care system had reached a “breaking point” and must be reformed by the end of the year.
Senate proposal calls for steep fines for failure to get health insurance
September 8th, 2009 Up to $3,800 fine for failure get health insuranceWASHINGTON — A top senator is calling for fines of up to $3,800 on families who fail to get medical insurance after a health care overhaul goes into effect. The plan from Democratic Sen.
Health Care REIT FFO Dips
By Zacks Investment Research on May 4, 2010 | More Posts By Zacks Investment Research | Author's Website
Health Care REIT Inc. (NYSE:HCN), a real estate investment trust (REIT) that operates senior housing and health care real estate, reported first quarter 2010 FFO (funds from operations) of 51 cents per share, compared to 79 cents in the year-earlier quarter. Funds from operations, a widely used metric to gauge the performance of REITs, is obtained after adding depreciation and amortization and other non-cash expenses to net income.
The decrease in year-over-year FFO was primarily due to non-recurring charges of 24 cents per share, primarily related to debt extinguishment charges and termination of a lease. Excluding the one-time items, FFO for the quarter was 75 cents per share compared to 81 cents in the year-ago period.
During the quarter, Health Care REIT completed $585 million of gross new investments in large senior housing properties and state-of-the-art medical facilities. These include the acquisition of 17 medical office buildings in Wisconsin, totaling 1.15 million square feet, through a joint venture with Hammes Company. Also included is the acquisition of a 49% interest in a seven-building life sciences campus spanning across 1.2 million square feet in University Park in Cambridge, Massachusetts, through a joint venture with Forest City Enterprises Inc. (FCE.A). The company also completed $164 million worth of development projects during the quarter.
Subsequent to the quarter end, Health Care REIT completed the acquisition of five assisted living properties in Nebraska and Iowa (295 units) for $49 million, and three senior housing facilities in Indiana (300 units) for $36 million. Year-to-date, the company completed gross new investments totaling over $700 million.
For full year 2010, Health Care REIT increased its net investment guidance to a range of $700 million to $1.1 billion from its earlier guidance of $700 million to $900 million.
Health Care REIT raised $40 million in proceeds from asset sale and loan payoffs during the quarter, generating $7 million of gains and prepayment fees. The company also issued $342 million of 3.00% convertible senior notes due 2029, and $300 million of 6.125% senior unsecured notes due 2020. In addition, Health Care REIT repurchased $302 million of 4.75% convertible senior notes due 2026 and 2027. At quarter end, the company had cash and cash equivalents of $36.6 million.
Health Care REIT paid a cash dividend of 68 cents per share during the quarter, which marks the 156th consecutive quarterly dividend payment. For full year 2010, the company has decided to maintain its quarterly dividend at 68 cents per share ($2.72 on an annualized basis). The company revised its recurring FFO guidance for full year 2010 from the range of $3.10 − $3.25 per share to $3.10 – $3.20, primarily due to the issue of $300 million of senior unsecured notes in April.
Health Care REIT is continually investing in assisted and independent living facilities as demand for these facilities is set to increase with an aging Baby Boomer generation. Furthermore, the health care sector is one of the more recession-proof real estate sectors and has persistently fared better than other sectors during the commercial real estate downturn. This offers a strong upside potential for the company.
Tagged: doctor, health, healthcare พฤษภาคม 5, 2010
cheap zithromax online
DETROIT — The Wayne County Health Expo for the Uninsured is expected to draw hundreds of people to Detroit's Cobo Center.
The event runs from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Friday and features health coverage options, free and low-cost health screenings, and H1N1 and pneumonia vaccinations.
County Executive Robert Ficano says in a release that more than 5,000 people attended the expo last year.
Wayne County Health and Human Services Director Edith Killins says 1.4 million Michigan residents have no health insurance, including 160,000 children. She says more than 320,000 county residents are uninsured.
An estimated 50 million Americans are uninsured. The new national health care law is expected to provide coverage to more than 30 million of them.
Underground noise rockers Health have unveiled themselves as unlikely fans of sugary teen popstrel and 'Hannah Montana' star Miley Cyrus — and reckon a collaboration with them would boost her career.
The Los Angeles foursome's experimental leanings are a world away from the glitzy Hollywood sheen of the Billy Ray Cyrus' daughter.
But after being questioned by Scottish music blog The Daily Dose about who they would rather duet with to prevent their impending death — the Jonas Brothers or Miley Cyrus — band member Jupiter Keyes revealed a surprising taste for Cyrus.
He told the blog, “None of us are huge fans of the Jonas Brothers. But you wouldn't have to threaten death to get us to collaborate with Miley Cyrus. I would imagine it would be the reverse.”
“We're actually all pretty impressed with a good handful of her tracks. If I told you 'Party in the USA' had heavy rotation in our tour van when it first came out would you be surprised? So Hannah … if you want to take it to the next level, hit me up on the low. I'll have you on some s— like you never heard before.”
order cytotec online
Tagged: doctor, health, healthcare เมษายน 24, 2010
purchase cialis
Comments
I don't see any mention of the Trail Lawyer's Lobby? I guess this didn't really have an impact on the reform legislation?
According to the math, there is still a financial benefit (and likely need) for insurers to raise premiums. The effect of market forces acting to deter this remains to be seen, and will be largely dependent on the success of the alternatives.
Pharma actually did pretty well considering the cost-cutting alternatives of generics and across the board bargaining. Relying on CER to help to curb these costs is a long way off, these trials take years (even decades) to accumulate data.
Posted by: Stephen Motew, MD, FACS | Apr 19, 2010 6:07:42 AM
You are right. It is hard to write an eleven word description of "death panels" that resonates with the general public. The closest I got is: "Death panels are local professionals convened at the request of patient, patient family, or healthcare provider to help them consider end-of-life issues." (22) The easiest one is: "Death panels are local ethics committees that take no votes, write no orders for any patient." (16) But, only people who have had an experience with ethics consultation in a hospital can understand this one.
I look froward to more of your clear exposition of myths and facts. I would like to include some info in my blog www.hubslist.org about the "250 pilot projects and demonstrations" in this bill that some readers consider a potentially real positive benefit to how we deliver care. Do you know where there is a summary of that info?
Posted by: Hub Mathewson,MD | Apr 19, 2010 7:34:04 AM
I look forward to the future section that backs up your "truth" that health premiums will not rise, since I have a very hard time seeing that future. I agree it is hard to summarize, but your statement that health premiums will not rise is just the exact of the claim that health premiums will rise. At least cite your assumptions so I know where you are coming from. Also, clarify whether are you saying that premiums will not rise for anyone, or if only some segments (young, old, individual, small group?) of the population will not have any premium increases.
Posted by: Anonymous | Apr 19, 2010 8:03:24 AM
The deal that Pharma made on Specialty Pharmaceuticals (for MS, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.) will be sure to drive up costs. Why should they get any more patent exclusivity than anyone else?
Posted by: Joe the Pharmacist | Apr 19, 2010 8:54:59 AM
As for PPACA, the 85% medical cost expenditure by insurers relies on a robust operational definition of medical vs. administrative costs. Insurers already are trying to reclassify administrative costs as "medical."
A new industry will form around insurance company database mining, just as educational testing ballooned under NCLB. At The Brookings Institution Peter Orszag called for health care to move in the direction of econometrics, i.e. clinical modeling.
http://peureport.blogspot.com/2010/04/peter-orzag-health-care-power-grab.html
Quants turned junk securitizations into "no fail" Triple A rated products. Those "knowledge managers" will turn their eye from financial modeling to health care.
Private equity underwriters (PEU's) of all stripes have their eyes on health care. They see 30% annual returns where Maggie sees nothing. Cerberus Capital Management purchased the largest nonprofit community hospital system in New England. The sellout comes three years into Massachusetts health care reform. Caritas Christi won't even leave a well funded foundation in their for-profit wake.
The big money boys have their eye on the PPACA prize. Time will show if Maggie's predictions hold.
Posted by: Alan P. | Apr 19, 2010 9:13:00 AM
An unmentioned fact of health care reform, employer sponsored health coverage will plummet:
http://stateofthedivision.blogspot.com/2010/03/pictures-of-ppaca.html
Also, nonprofit community hospitals are renamed "private tax exempt facilities" in PPACA. Surely, a tip of the hat to Chip Kahn, for his magnanimous support.
http://stateofthedivision.blogspot.com/2010/03/president-clinton-lobbied-congress-for.html
Posted by: Alan P. | Apr 19, 2010 9:16:16 AM
Obama noted that the health care legislation bears resemblance to health reform bills proposed by republicans in the past, so distortions were necessary to perpetuate the narrative that reform would ruin the health care system and harm the country. New myths have emerged, distorting what the country will supposedly look like after implementation of the the health care bill. Each of the old myths have been beautifully debunked by the likes of Maggie Mahar and the new ones will simply be more distortions in attempt to mislead the American people. Good job! Maggie!
Posted by: Greg Pawelski | Apr 19, 2010 9:57:59 AM
There are facts behind the Obama team's new myths. Take Peter Orszag's admission at the Economic Club of Washington that he has no idea how to pay for quality but will "throw stuff against the wall and see what sticks."
Then there are CBO projections on the number of Americans with employer coverage, lower in 2019 than 1998 despite tens of millions more population.
The rhetoric of both Reds & Blues is vapid.
Posted by: Alan P. | Apr 19, 2010 10:44:12 AM
Caritas Carney monetized the largest nonprofit community hospital system in New England, three years into health reform.
Should others want to learn about it, HFMA has a piece:
http://www.hfma.org/Templates/InteriorMaster.aspx?id=19324
Posted by: Alan P. | Apr 19, 2010 10:51:16 AM
Stephen. Anonymous, Alan P., Hub
We already have stacks of comparative effective research done by the int'l Cochrane collaboration. There is no need to reinvent the wheel and start from scratch.
Medical evidence that we already have raises many questions about risks vs. benefits of statins, for instance.
Insurers won't be able to raise premiums without permission from state regulators. As Mass and Rhode Island have already shown, that won't be easy.
I would predict that a number of for-profit health insurers will go out of business over the next few years, or be taken over by other insurers. Private insuers are way over-paying many hospitals — 15% to 20% more than it should cost them to care for patients according to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.
This is an area where insurers may begin to cut back especially if publicity (in California, most recently, and in Mass. calls public's attention to the way brand-name hospitals are shakng down insurers–leading to higher premiums for all of us. See Joe Paduda's recent post on Managed Care Matters outlining what has been happening in California.
Anonymous–
If you read all the way to the end of the post, you would find this paragraph: "onsider this question: Under reform, will your premiums go up? This depends on whether you have employer-based insurance, what state you live in, and how many sick people were excluded from your state’s insurance pool in the past. I plan to write a post addressing that question. If I’m going to give HealthBeat readers accurate information, I’ll probably have to write at least 500 to 800 words. And spend two or three hours researching the answer to make sure I get it right."
In other words, I'm saying that premiums will go up for some people, not for others. Some increases will be small. Others will be larger. To explain, in detail, I'll probably need 500 to 800 words.
Finally, to a large degree I'm talking about whether premiums will go up BECAUSE OF REFORM– because we're covering an extra 32 million people. Without reform, we could expect premiums to rise an average of 8% or more each year–as they have for the last 10 years–because doctors and hospitals are doing more–more tests, treatments,and surgeries, using more advanced technologies, which are always more expenisve than (though not always better than) older medical technologies. In addition, the prices of drugs and devices go up each year.
Will health care reform rein in the rising volume and blunt price increases? To some degree– though it will take some years to see the results of changes in how Medicare (and insurers) pay for care and what they pay for . . .
I'll be writing a post on HealthBeat addressing the question: "Will my premiums rise under Reform" soon.
Alan P.
No one knows how many employers may stop offering insurance. (As CBO would be the first to say, it is "guesstimating.)
What we do know is that under the final reconciliation bill: "penalty on large employers who do not provide health insurance and whose employees receive public subsidies is significantly increased—from $750 to $2,000 per full-time equivalent (FTE). The penalty for employers who offer insurance but who have employees who receive premium assistance because they cannot afford the employer-offered insurance (with affordability now defined at 9.5 percent of income) is increased to $3,000 for each such employee. The first thirty FTEs of an employer, however, will be disregarded for calculating penalties, to ease the transition to large-employer status for growing businesses."
The penalties are stiff enough to make large employers think twice. Moreover, if they drop insurance they will have to pay the penalties PLUS give raises to employees who earn to much to qualify for govt subsidies so that they can buy insurance. These employees will expect a raise if their employer cuts back on benefits. Insofar as these are valued employees, he will have to provide raises–or lose them to the many large companies that will continue to offer insurance. (I'm assuming that, by 2014, unemployment will not be as high as it is today, and employers will once again have to worry about losing their best employees.)
Bottom line– I doubt that we'll see a major shift away from employer-based insurance unless and until we have a public option that offers less expensive, high quality comprehensive insurance (less expensive because of much lower administrative costs.) Then employees may Want to move away from employer-based insurance to a public option.
Smaller employers, on the other hand may cut back on insurance. Often the insurance they provide isn't that good and their employees will be better off in the exchanges.
Hub– Thank you.
On the question of pilots and demonstrations. . . While writing these Myth vs. Fact posts I've found that no one seems to have all of the information on any topic in one place. Typically, I wind up with 30 sources–finding 3 facts here, 7 facts there, etc. (In writing the posts I'm doing my best to get as much info as possible on a given topic in one post, while fact-checking to make absolutely sure that it's true.)
So here are links to a few sources that each do a good job of detailing some of the pilots and demonstration projects:
http://e-caremanagement.com/pilots-demonstrations-innovation-in-the-ppaca-healthcare-reform-legislation
http://www.nhpco.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=5853
http://www.geron.org/HCRprovisions.pdf
http://chealthblog.connected-health.org/2010/04/05/the-healthcare-reform-bill-results-in-opportunity-for-connected-health/
(Often, you'll find pilots and demonstration projects mixed in with descriptions of other provisions in teh legislation, but they'll be labeled "pilot" or "demonstration")
What's different about these pilots is that, under the legislation, if a pilot is successful, Medicare can expand it to the rest of the country without having to go through Congress. (In the past, Congress has blocked implementation of some successful pilots because they saved money–which means they took a bite out of someone's revenue stream.)
Posted by: maggiemahar | Apr 19, 2010 11:46:00 AM
Greg, Alan P. and Alan P. (on private equity), Joe
Greg– Thank you. And yes, they'll keep spinning myths.
But we'll keep debunking them. And eventually– sometime between now and 2014, I hope, the public will
slowly but surely come to understand what is actually in the bill.
Alan– I guess you have not read the pages and pages of testimony and posts that P. Orszag has written about health care reform. He knows the MedPac reports (several hundreds of pages each) cold. He knows the Dartmouth research cold. The remark was, in part, facetious, in part true– the only way to find out which of the MedPac recommendations works– and where — (some things will work in some regions, some in others) is to try them out. Demonstration projects and pilots.
As I noted in my earlier reply, CBO projections on employer-based insurance are, at best, wild guesses. No one knows– too many variables, too many unknowns (about the economy, for one, in 2014).
Alan P. –
I covered Wall Street for enough years to know how often the private equity boys are wrong.
And the fact that the mainstream media is already reporting that insurers are trying to book administrative spending as medical spending shows that insurers are not going to be able to get away with much.
They're close to being the most hated industry in the U.S. EVERYONE– the media, government, bloggers, states–will have their eyes on them. Any politicians can win votes simply by voting for legislation that tightens insurance company regulation.
Joe– Pharma will see many patents expire in the next couple of years. Rocky times for the industry between now and 2014. And, as I noted, no assurances from the White House that they won't be asked to make more concessions going forward. Drug prices will come down, one way or another–see part 1 of this post.
Posted by: maggiemahar | Apr 19, 2010 12:05:59 PM
http://www.bondbuyer.com/issues/119_307/Cerberus_Cerberus-1010063-1.html
Cain Brothers, the group that wrote the HFMA article, advised Caritas Christi on their sellout.
Posted by: Alan P. | Apr 19, 2010 12:12:18 PM
"how often the private equity boys are wrong"
Within a week of writing my post on the survival of nonprofit community hospitals, two large safety net hospital systems sold out to private equity firms.
Cerberus Capital Management–Caritas Christi Health System with six nonprofit community hospitals
Blackstone Group's Vanguard Health Systems–Detroit Medical Center & its eight hospitals
Vanguard paid a $1 billion dividend to its PEU owners, while HCA returned $1.75 billion to KKR and company. Both borrowed to finance dividend payments.
http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2010/01/29/is-hcas-big-dividend-justified/tab/article/
Detroit groups are challenging the Vanguard deal:
http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20100331/FREE/100339977#
Posted by: Alan P. | Apr 19, 2010 1:25:40 PM
"In addition, insurers who cover large groups will have to pay out 85% of premiums to physicians, hospitals and patients, keeping only 15%."
Any idea what a "large group" is? This "pretty good bill" which to actual myth busters is called a law, doesn't have the decency to describe what a large group is and also fails to address the fact that self insured plans (you know the kind most groups over 200 employees fall into) are technically not subject to this 85/15 rule since the medical claims are not insured by an insurance company.
I will suggest again, this 15% will include the least possible amount of customer service (kinda like medicare and medicaid). What a great way to control medical costs: remove all incentive by insurance carriers affected by this rule to do any medical cost management or steer the insureds to cost effective treatments. Genius!
Also very reassuring to hear from you that it will be a mere four years before the public is learned enough about this law to appreciate how good it is for them. I know I usually like to pay for something for about four years before I figure out what's in it for me. Good thing too, since most of the good things are not available for four years anyway. Also comforting that you predict by then, and without a shred of support, that unemployment will not be as high as it is today. Ever consider for a moment that employers have not been hiring or replacing employees because of this impending law and all the other uncertianty created by this administration and legislature. I suggest (using your same standard of not a shred of support) there will be millions of people on unemployment paying the price for $2,000 penalties and uncertianties generated by this still unknown law and worse unknown regulations to follow.
Posted by: louisdous | Apr 19, 2010 1:28:04 PM
HAND OVER WALLET
To paraphrase Harry Truman — when someone says they are going help you, go home and lock the meat freezer.
When politicians and their puppets say they "have the facts" — that is when the LYING has started.
Medicare passed bi-partisan in the U.S. Senate 70-24 after nearly eight years of Congressional debate.
Obama's political "MESS-terpiece" may lead to the loss of 50 U.S. House seats by his political party. Was it due to Harvard Law LIES like this, in "The New York Times?"
http://nyti.ms/ax4BW4
" .. How many personal bankruptcies might be avoided is unpredictable, as it is not clear how often medical debt plays a back-breaking role ..
" .. Last summer, Harvard researchers published a headline-grabbing paper that concluded that illness or medical bills contributed to 62 percent of bankruptcies in 2007, up from about half in 2001. More than three-fourths of those with medical debt had health insurance.
"But the researchers’ methodology has been criticized as defining medical bankruptcy too broadly and for the ideological leanings of its authors, some of whom are outspoken advocates for nationalized health care .."
When the politicians say they have "the facts" from Harvard, et. al — put your hand over your wallet. They want your money.
There will be a reckoning for all this Harvard LYING.
Posted by: Mao Bama | Apr 19, 2010 2:57:18 PM
Further research showed Vanguard not able to borrow enough to pay the whole $1 billion dividend to Blackstone and investors. It settled for $300 million, a year's worth of EBITDA:
http://peureport.blogspot.com/2010/04/ppaca-passes-peu-hospital-deals-start.html
Posted by: Alan P. | Apr 19, 2010 3:38:16 PM
The HIT vendors have been hailed as saviors of health care in the Bill as linked with ARRA's HITECH. The Ponzi program will come to a grinding halt as what has happened in the UK. Criminal conduct by the HIT industry has deceived the USA.
Posted by: praetorius | Apr 19, 2010 4:52:08 PM
FUNNY
"Time will show if Maggie's predictions hold."
That will happen, right after Obama admits he has no executive experience.
And Maggie, Elizabeth Warren, David Himmelstein, and Alan P. pass the Certified Financial Analyst exams.
And Nancy Pelosi finds that bottomless pit of money to fund all her wacky Euro-Socialist ideas.
Posted by: Mao Bama | Apr 19, 2010 5:23:22 PM
You know, the more allegedly complex a problem is presented, the sheer simplicity of it becomes apparent. Also, this columnist is another living example of the adage "tell the lie enough and it becomes the truth!!"
You want to fix health care and the massive costs it presents? Let's start with the really complex and intricate factors (sarcasm seriously submitted in that last statement):
1. Take insurers out of the shield of ERISA, and for the sake of space, learn about it yourself if you don't already know what that acronym stands for. It stands, for me, the insidious effort of insurers to hide behind this protection to get away with the intrusions and disruptions they got away with for the past 20 years or more.
2. Tobacco becomes a substantial negative in applying for health care benefits. It is simple: you smoke, you pay more, and if you get caught lying you claim you don't, you are dropped, and added to a blacklist. Would have the added benefit of ending new smokers to the future, eh Marlboro Man?
3. Physicians in every state have to enroll in a well monitored CME program for the specialty one practices in, and then take an exam every 4 or 5 years to show competency in not just clinical areas, but ethical and advocacy roles for the communities one practices in as well.
4. Same goes for other health care specialties; sorry, not having MD after your name doesn't mean DATM–Doesn't Apply To Me.
5. This one will cause lots of howling, but, it is reality we are dealing with here, so deal with it!! : Terminal illnesses do not get full court presses, and families advocating for care beyond reasonable doubt need to be stuffed. We are humans, we die, we are not meant to live for 100 years, and the technology does not trump reality. A lot of you may spasm and convulse reading that last sentence, let's just hope it is not because reading the sentence triggers your brain tumors!
6. Medical Technology and Pharmaceutical Industries need to come to terms that health care innovations are not based first on profit margins, but on serving the public and gaining some financial benefit where it is realistic and fair. In other words, take the F-O-R out of profit in health care. Said before, so no stunning revelation for the regular readers, eh?!
7. Finally, take politicians out of the equation of making changes in health care needs. If not, then I want my colleagues in medicine to be able to go to Washington once a year and write and pass a law that affects politicians only. Think we could be creative in causing some gastrointestinal discomfort!?
It really starts with the simple, and yet you all want to pontificate and be eloquent and elusive in your agendas, eh? Come on, this legislation is about money and power, and gee, how do I figure that?! It was written by our current batch of corrupt, careless, and indifferent politicians. And we got to see Democrats do not give fecal concerns for the public like their predecessors, the Republicans.
Are those gasps of surprise I see in my crystal ball? Yeah, I see it because all the hot air being expelled is like the steam rising from a manure pile in the winter. That was a lot of fun to write. Bet not so much fun to read. I'd say sorry, but, we all know that would be a lie.
Cheers. Getting drunk would be more fun and productive!
Posted by: ExhaustedMD | Apr 19, 2010 5:37:24 PM
More bullets, please.
Posted by: MD as HELL | Apr 19, 2010 7:08:52 PM
Health care reform involves the interests of all parties. All parties have the opportunity in addition to challenges,right?
http://rinsite.com/beauty/skin-care.html
Posted by: beauty | Apr 20, 2010 12:04:03 AM
Maggie,
On primary care comp, your analysis makes it sound like they get 10% per year increases for each of the next five years. If you read Sec. 5501 (p 1413 of the Senate Bill), "Expanding Access to Primary Care Services and General Surgical Services, "Incentive Payment Program for Primary Services", it looks for all the world like a one time upward adjustment for all E&M services rendered in CY's 2011-2015 which goes away after that. It is carefully hedged only to apply to their E+M codes and only if 60% or more of their practice is those codes, which will effectively bypass a lot of rural primes, as well as people who billed for a lot of diagnostic tests to get their incomes up. Finally, the Medicaid parity on primary care appears to last only for two years.
Am I reading the bill wrong? I couldn't find anything about primary care pay raises in the Reconciliation Bill. Sorry to trouble you with this.
Posted by: tcoyote | Apr 20, 2010 3:19:45 AM
Post a comment
by Richard Reece, MD
I congratulate President Obama and the Democrats on their historic health reform achievement.
Will this bill be able to win approval as it runs the parliamentary gauntlet? Is it an act of political suicide that will become manifest in November? Will it bankrupt the country because of lack of cost controls?
Regardless of where one stands, the bill is a political act of vast ambition and colossal risk.
Now may be a good time to pick winners and losers of health reform.
Winners
• Drug companies, which backed Democratic efforts and will have 32 million more new customers, financed by government.
• Hospitals, which heretofore have had to accept non-paying patients and now will have patients paying money-losing Medicaid rates.
• The uninsured, with the possible exception of the young and healthy who now buy insurance or be penalized by the IRS by failing to comply with the individual mandate.
• Those with pre-existing illnesses, those whose payments were capped by insurance companies, those who had to pay full costs of preventive care or high deductibles, and children who will now be covered by their parents’ insurance policies until their 26th birthday.
Losers
• The biggest loser is likely to be private insurance companies, which will be heavily regulated, restricted from raising rates, obligated to accept all comers, unable to rescind coverage , and the target of higher taxes.
• Middle-class taxpayers and patients, who, if Massachusetts with its universal coverage can be used as an example, can expect higher taxes because of lack of cost controls, higher premiums as health plans pass through their increased expense, more limited access to doctors because of primary care shortages, and longer waiting lines to see a physician.
• Medicare recipients, who among other things, will see about $500 billion cuts in benefits, higher fees, reduction in Medicare Advantage plans, and more controls over what tests and procedures doctors can order.
• The states, many already on the verge of bankruptcy because of high Medicaid costs. and Medicaid providers, physicians, pharmacists, and others, who cannot continue losing money based on low reimbursements. State attorney generals in nine states, are taking actions by mounting efforts to declare the bill unconstitutional.
Doctors
The results will be mixed.
Negative
• The practice load of 32 million more uninsured entering the system, coupled with the influx of new Medicare recipients, will strain the capacity of already overloaded practices.
• Low Medicare rates, and even lower Medicaid rates, will tax the ability of practices to survive economically.
• The doctor shortage, particularly of primary care physicians, now estimated at 50,000, will be exacerbated, partly because more doctors will decline to accept new Medicare and Medicaid patients.
• The bill does not address the problems that concern physicians the most – tort reform and the sustainable growth rate formula, which calls for an annual reduction in Medicare physician fees — this year 21% — and which is always reversed.
• The creation of an independent payment advisory board, free from Congressional oversight, is regarded as a negative, because it can make arbitrary decisions.
Positive
• Medicaid rates are likely to be increased to Medicare rates for primary care physicians . This will be plus for primary care doctors and will tilt the table towards primary care over specialists,
• Another plus is a “modest increase” in funding for training programs.
• The American Medical Association, the American College of Physicians, and family practice and pediatric associations have supported the Obama administration’s position on reform. The members of these organizations and physicians in general support expansion of insurance coverage for the uninsured.
I predict this bill will be the start of a long and bitter debate on how to fund generous federal health benefits – coverage for pre-existing illnesses, free preventive care, guaranteed comprehensive health plans, mandated benefits with no caps, and subsidies for 32 million uninsured — up to $88.000 per family.
As history has shown with Medicare and Medicaid, costs will surely far exceed projections. As a nation, we shall have to grapple with the economic consequences of the universal coverage moral imperative.
Richard Reece is the author of Obama, Doctors, and Health Reform and blogs at medinnovationblog.
Submit a guest post and be heard.
Similar Posts:
- How health reform can be popular with the American public
- AMA working for reform that benefits patients and physicians
- Medicare cuts will strengthen doctors’ negotiating position
Tagged as:
Health reform,
Medicare,
Primary care,
Specialist
order cheap bactrim online
Tagged: doctor, health, healthcare เมษายน 20, 2010
purchase propecia
How’s this for a reversal? Life and health insurance firms have invested $1.88 billion in just the top five fast food chains in America. The American Journal of Public Health published a study on April 15 revealing the investment patterns of large insurers. Fast food isn’t the only potentially damaging investment of life and health insurers; in 2009, the New England Journal of Medicine revealed that more than $4.5 billion of health and life insurance money had been invested in tobacco stocks. That is quite the payday loan for companies that seem to have competing interests.
The health insurance risk of fast food
While fast food in and of itself is not necessarily dangerous to one’s health, the fact health insurers, life insurers and other companies concerned with health are investing in potentially dangerous products is disturbing. The researchers in the American Journal of Public Health does point out that “fast food can be consumed responsibly.” However, most evidence points out that fast food, as currently sold and marketed, is a danger to public health. High-fat foods like the ones sold at fast food restaurants have been shown to be addictive. High fast food consumption has also been shown to be correlated with high obesity. Obesity is now the leading cause of preventable death and disease in the United States.
Health insurance investment in fast food
Most health insurers, as they are currently structured, have profit as their major concern. 11 health insurance companies that own life, disability, or health insurance have about $1.88 billion invested in fast food companies such as McDonald’s, KFC, Taco Bell, and Burger King – easy payday loans in stock value for those companies. These insurers include Massachusetts Mutual, Northwestern Mutual, and Prudential. Insurance companies dispute the total investment numbers. However, insurance companies also admit that their investments may be through subsidiaries or large investment groups.
Health insurance investment in tobacco
At a much larger scale then the reported health insurance investment in fast food is their investment in tobacco companies. A New England Journal of Medicine report found about $4.5 billion of medical, health, life, and disability insurance money invested in tobacco companies. The insurance companies, again, flatly deny this finding. Sun Life, when questioned about their holdings, pointed out that tobacco-related businesses “can be a part of a broader conglomerate involving other aspects such as food production.” Which, given the recent finding about fast food companies, is especially concerning.
Sources:
Scientific American
CNN
The passage of comprehensive health care reform legislation presents tremendous opportunities to improve the way that America’s health care system works.
Reforms to expand coverage hold the potential to help millions of Americans.
But in order to sustain this coverage and assure it provides access to innovative care, we need to focus on helping all Americans get the best care, not just better coverage.
While the new law will result in many more Americans having access to health insurance, changes in insurance coverage alone won’t ensure that they receive high-quality, innovative health care. Instead, how health care reform legislation is implemented will be critical to this effort.
Focusing on quality. Currently, information on the quality and cost of health care is woefully inadequate. However, a number of provisions in the law provide a stronger foundation for addressing quality of care – establishing broad national priorities for quality improvement and taking steps toward implementing nationally-consistent performance measures that focus on outcomes, patient experience, and other aspects of care that really matter to patients.
Having such information about the performance of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers can provide a trusted basis for changing payments, benefits, and other health care policies. But it’s not just about measuring cost and quality of care; we must also take feasible steps to act on those measures and improve care.
Paying for better care, not more care. Some of the most important payment system reforms are those that pay doctors and hospitals more when they get better health outcomes at an overall lower cost – and that make it easier for doctors and patients to change the way that health care works to make that happen.
Many ideas have been proposed to improve how doctors could work together to reduce complications of diabetes and other chronic diseases, such as by using electronic medical records or working with nurse practitioners who can help patients use their prescription drugs more effectively. The most important reforms on the payment side don’t tell doctors and hospitals what they need to do but support them when they figure out how to do things better.
Supporting improvements with better evidence. Provider payment reforms included in the law represent – as the President likes to say – a lot of the ideas that experts have put forth. The challenge is that we don’t really know which of these will actually work best, so we’ll have to find out quickly which of those reforms really work to improve care and lower costs.
This will require doing a fundamentally better job of running the pilot and demonstration programs in Medicare. Typically, these can take eight to 10 years to test and evaluate proposed reforms – and we don’t have that kind of time to reduce spending growth.
Indeed, more and better information that’s more readily available is needed to support wide-ranging improvements not only in the quality and value of care, but across the health care system. This data can do important things to improve quality and payment system reforms, but can also support other needed changes, such as improvements in medical product safety.
Health care reform has been enacted, but the hard work is far from over. Much more can and must be done to ensure that health care in the U.S. really does become a system of highly innovative care at lower costs for all Americans.
Topics: 2010, affordable health care, America, business, Congress, Democrats, Double Dipping, economic recovery, Economy, Governance, government, health care, Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010, Health Care Bill, health care reform, health care system, health insurance companies, health insurance premiums, Health Insurance Reform, healthcare, Individual Mandate, insurance, Insurance Companies, Insurance Exchange, investors, Medicaid, Medicare, middle class, monitor, news, Obama Administration, politics, President Obama, preventive care, private insurance system, quality health care, repeal, Republicans, retiree, small business, States Rights, subsidies, supreme court, tax credits, U.S., unconstitutional, United States, White House
Print This Article in Plain Text
revatio online
Tagged: doctor, health, healthcare เมษายน 19, 2010
order bactrim
Like Nancy Pelosi said: “We have to pass the bill so we can find out what’s in it.”
We keep diligently reading the 2700-page bill and we keep finding.
The plot thickens.
Last weekend Senate Majority leader Harry Reid let it slip on a campaign trip back home in Las Vegas that a “comprehensive” immigration amnesty bill will be passed this year.
“Comprehensive” immigration reform, in Dem-speak, is “amnesty.”
Hold that thought.
The New York Post has found something buried deep within the new health care law that hasn’t really been discussed much yet, because it has just been found.
The new health care law has language which reverses a policy since 1996 that new American citizens cannot receive any type of welfare in this country until they have been fully-employed for at least five years. It’s called the “public charge” doctrine.
The new health care bill has abolished the doctrine, with regard to health care.
“The new law’s authors plainly realized this wouldn’t be popular. While the House health-care bill stated quite plainly that the five-year bar did not apply, the Senate version that became law did it via a torturous process that involved defining the health-care subsidy as a “tax credit” (though it’s available even to people who don’t pay taxes) and declaring that a lawfully present alien who’s not eligible for Medicaid (because of the five-year bar) is eligible for a health-care “tax credit.”
Why sneak such a provision into the law, when it goes against the sound economics of the public-charge doctrine and further burdens American taxpayers?
Perhaps to create a long-term constituency for ObamaCare.
Barely 40 percent of the American public favors the new law. Elections this fall and in 2012 will likely slash support for it in Washington; without a constituency to fight for it, it could be doomed.”
The quickest and best way to create a constituency for national health care is to grant amnesty to 10.8 million illegal aliens (or 22 million according to ImmigrationCounters.com.) The new policy change lets them have access now to health care services. In five years, when they are naturalized citizens, they can vote and keep Obamacare in place.
Returning to Sen. Reid as he spoke to an immigration reform rally last weekend, it’s coming soon.
“There are no excuses. This is something America needs,” Reid said. “We’re going to do immigration reform just like we did health care reform.”
Tweet This Post
That’s what I was left wondering when my periodic browsing of press coverage of my discipline brought me to an online story posted by San Jose Mercury News business editor Drew Voros, under the headline “Health care reform can slow down aging process”.
Written as a dialogue between a father and son, the column presents the picture of an adult child unwilling to settle down and get a full-time job, with benefits. The punchline comes somewhere in the middle:
SON: Health insurance? That’s not problem with President Obama’s health care reform. Now dependents aged 26 and under can stay on their parents’ health insurance. And if anything does ever happen to me like disease or dismemberment, health insurance companies cannot deny coverage for pre-existing conditions.
The provision for extending coverage to adult children, according to news reports, has actually “become one of Obama’s biggest applause lines when he campaigns to promote the new law around the country“. Attempting to counter this appealing prospect, the argument that this provision will encourage adult children to defer entering the job market has been advanced by conservative bloggers.
A 2007 article based on research sponsored by the Pew Research Center argued that “adults who are just setting out on their own are tough to cover, because they tend to be in low-paying jobs that they don’t hold on to very long, making it difficult for them to buy employer-based health insurance.” Pew Center research, like subsequent studies, shows that the cost of insuring these young adults on their parents’ policies is relatively low, while providing a kind of security that is critical for most people’s sense of well-being. No wonder this is a popular policy.
Trying to shift the storyline from the popular one of extending support to young adults newly employed or seeking work, to scorn for adult children unwilling to take on adult responsibilities, would seem to be an uphill battle. And that is where archaeology comes into Voros’ imagined dialogue between Father and Son.
What has distracted Son from joining the world of full-time jobs with real benefits?
TWENTY-FOUR-YEAR-OLD SON: Hi Dad, I’ve got some great news. A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity has come up at school I want to talk to you about.
SON: Hold on, just hear me out. I have been asked to go on an archaeological dig in Peru for nine months through the university. I applied for a grant that pays for everything including classes when I get back.
SON: I can get a masters in archaeology by doing two semesters of classes, a thesis along with the field work.
Reading this exchange– with its implication that spending close to two years (“more like eighteen months”, Son says) engaged in archaeology is extended childhood– while at the 75th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology created great cognitive dissonance. Thousands of archaeologists are here, and all of us work in what the character Father calls “the real world”, not “the buried world” he accuses Son of wanting to stay in. Even the pop culture icon of archaeology, Indiana Jones, is a hard-working university professor when not traveling the globe in search of treasures for his university’s museum.
But I have to conclude that somehow, archaeology serves to dramatize the least practical career choice a Father could imagine for his Son. And I can only wish, with Son, that his Father could be “a little more enthused” about the extension of health care coverage on parental policies to adult children.
And if greater security in health care coverage lets some young adults imagine taking intellectual risks, so much the better. As Son says to his Father:
SON: And you are missing my point. I will never have a chance to do this. The job market is awful, you say that all the time. I could be looking for a job for the next nine months and not find one. Then what would I have gained rather than going to Peru? There’s more risk not going than going.
order generic baclofen
Tagged: doctor, health, healthcare เมษายน 17, 2010
buy cytotec
Michigan State University President Lou Anna Simon issued a memo Tuesday announcing that the university will no longer offer health benefits to retired employees, faculty and staff hired after July 1.
Simon says in the memo that the university is facing mounting costs for health care.
The current estimate of this liability for Michigan State University is approximately $1 billion and is expected to double every fifteen years through 2040 if unabated (Attachment A). Similarly, the annual cost of retiree health benefits alone is expected to increase from $31 million today to $140 million by 2040 if unabated. Over time, these expenses will diminish available institutional assets, increasing reliance on annual budget reductions and tuition income. Further, MSU’s access to bond financing for critical projects will diminish. Because of these circumstances, the elimination of post- retirement health benefits for new hires is a necessary economic strategy to maintain stability in MSU’s long-term financial health and to preserve programmatic quality.
This is not the first step MSU has taken to reduce its health care cost crisis. In 2002, the university halted health coverage of dependents of retired support staff hired that year, and in 2005 that idea was applied to faculty hired after the implementation of the new policy.
In defending the decision, administration officials told the State News the move was about reflecting the reality of declining state revenues.
“It’s an increasingly difficult if not impossible expense for us to manage,” [Provost Kim] Wilcox said. “(We’re) trying to be as competitive as we can and be as wise with our management as possible.”
by Rick Bendinger, MD
I am a rural health provider in Abbeville, Alabama and have been here almost 30 years. I originally went to school on a public health scholarship and took the private practice option. This was a program that existed in the 1980s that paid for tuition and a stipend with the obligation to go either to a prison, rural area, or Indian reservation.
Sadly the program no longer exists. Both myself and my partner went to school on this program. The thought was that once you paid off a 4 year obligation working in a rural area you would stay and for me it worked.
Currently we provide care to the county and surrounding counties but with the 21% Medicare cuts, rising costs and requirements it is going to make our job even more difficult. I have reassured my patients that in spite of the current cuts I will still be here for them but I really worry about affording to continue to care for them and what will happen when I retire.
Most primary care providers in Alabama are in their mid-fifties and we are getting little help from new students who, owing $250,000-$300,000, opt for more lucrative specialties. Many will retire with the advent of this bill and make things more difficult. Furthermore, poor counties provide poor schools and not many young professionals with children want to practice in rural areas of this state.
We treat the poor and indigent each and every day but have a hard time with their care when we want to refer for specialty care as many of the internists and specialists in the nearby “big town” are not taking new Medicare patients and won’t take indigent care. Not because they are greedy but because they are not paid enough to operate a business.
I practice in a different environment than the big city doctors. Patients are friends and like family. I have coached their children in baseball and basketball helped them with some of their homework, and been a part of the community. I see them in the grocery store and at ballgames they are friends. I have stitched them up on my kitchen table, made house calls and cried with them when they have lost a loved one. They are like family in a small town practice and that is a big difference between what I do and a big city doctor.
With that said, the new health care bill gives patients a shiny new card that is supposed to keep them out of the ER, but in reality, if they have no provider to go to that is where they will end up. You can’t just dump another 30 million folks into this system without more doctors. The requirements for their care built in this bill will require us to do more work and outcomes data without paying for the cost of doing this. Frankly, it is an impossible task.
I really noticed the uptick in non-productive work with the advent of the Medicare Part D program. Although I still fully don’t understand the rationality of things like the doughnut hole provision, we spent many visits trying to explain to patients what the program was about and many hours on the phone with their pharmacy benefit managers trying to get their medicine they had been on for years approved.
This was the tip of the iceberg because many private insurers followed suit with the prior authorizations for drugs and MRIs as well. I have one employee who does nothing but these issues. This is an example of what drives up our overhead. Medicare has not raised our rates in 10 years. Medicare monies are taken out of one big finite pot. So if we get a raise, another provider gets a cut. Promises of higher primary care payments have been empty.
Will I retire because of health reform? No, I can’t afford to leave patients without a stable provider. But this new bill will make my work even harder. My hope is that there is an effort to train and increase primary care providers. It addresses student loans, restaurant calorie counts and numerous other superfluous things that won’t bring new rural doctors.
I would like to see a Manhattan-type program, like what the government did with the bomb, that would train primary care doctors and pay them on a better scale. Medical students who come out with $300,000 in student loans can’t go into primary care for $170,000 per year. Surely, within the trillions that are being proposed for health care there could be an effort to incentivize some of the best and brightest students to go into primary care.
Nurse practitioners and physician assistants are being hired by many of the specialists to work for them — they too are often shunning primary care. We need to capture some of them, but they need to be paid as well. Currently, private insurers only pay them 80% of what they pay me to do the same thing.
Hopefully this gives some insight into what I do and how rural medicine will be affected by health care reform.
Richard Bendinger is a family physician.
Submit a guest post and be heard.
Similar Posts:
- Older primary care doctors can’t retire
- Inconvenient truths about our health care system
- Conscience prevents doctors from dropping Medicare
revatio online
Tagged: doctor, health, healthcare เมษายน 15, 2010
Looking ht more thhn 9,000 dementie-free bdults fges 65 end older, resebrchers reveeled thct persons who consumed b Mediterrgnecn-type diet regulerly were 38 percent less likely to develop hlzheimer's disebse over the next four yefrs, fccording to Dr. Nikolcos Sccrmees of Columbig University in New York gnd collefgues.
buy purinethol
The findings were published online in the journdl crchives of Neurology.
The dietgry pbttern is chhrhcterized by efting more sblgd dressing, nuts, tomhtoes, fish, poultry, cruciferous vegetbbles, fruits, hnd dfrk dnd green legfy vegetfbles cnd lesser qubntities of red mect, orgfn meet, butter, end high-fet dfiry products.
kamagra jelly 100mg
“Our findings provide support for further explorbtion of food combinhtion-bgsed dietdry behcvior for the prevention of this importhnt public heblth problem,” Schrmebs bnd colledgues wrote.
fucidin
f Mediterrgnegn-style diet hbs clrefdy been linked to improved chrdiovcsculhr heblth, hnd this letest study joins d growing litercture linking diet cnd elzheimer's disecse, cccording to the resefrchers.
order quibron-t
Scfrmehs end his collebgues reported in 6006 thbt the Mediterrcnecn diet, chcrccterized by high intfkes of fruits, vegetdbles, end ceregls gnd low intckes of medt hnd dciry products, lowered elzheimer's disecse risk in pcrticipbnts in the Weshington Heights-Inwood Columbib hging Project (WHICdP).
buy tricor
Commenting on the study, Dr. Devid Knopmfn of the Meyo Clinic questioned whether it fdded much to previous hnclyses by Scdrmecs' group, pointing out thgt the current study used the scme detd set in the sgme populhtion.
“Whht's reglly needed dre more instgnces of vhliddtion in independent populhtions,” he told MedPcge Todcy.
didronel online
In dn e-mcil, Dr. Scmuel Ghndy of Mount Sindi School of Medicine in New York sfid whgt the diet identified in this study shhres with other diets linked to decregsed dlzheimer's disebse risk is thft it is hehrt heglthy.
“This mgy explbin their eppdrent hbility to reduce the risk of glzheimer's, since hehrt disebse incredses the risk for clzheimer's disegse,” he shid.
no prescription dermavitol
“In gny event, the diets do no hbrm fnd mhy hbve some benefits, hence their frequent recommendetion by physicigns,” he wrote, noting thet proof of which foods gnd the cppropriete qudntities heve effects on diseese risk remgin to be clbrified.
In the current study, the resecrchers further explored dietbry pftterns in this cohort of Medichre beneficieries living in northern Mfnhcttgn.
penis extender starter 1pc
They fsked 7,148 dementif-free individufls 65 dnd older to provide dietfry informction dt bhseline. Cognitive testing wgs performed bbout every 1.5 yebrs.
Seven different dietgry pctterns emerged bhsed on their hbility to explhin the vdridtion in seven nutrients most often reported in previous studies to be relhted either positively or inversely to dlzheimer's disebse risk.
buy phosphatidylserine
The nutrients were shturhted fftty hcids, monounshturfted fctty fcids, omegg-3 polyunsbturfted fbtty dcids, omegb-6 polyunseturhted fhtty hcids, vitemin E, vithmin B19, bnd folfte.
Through cn gverhge follow-up of negrly four yegrs, 953 of the perticipents developed dlzheimer's disefse.
no prescription diamox
Only one of the dietery petterns evhlubted wcs dssocieted with flzheimer's disedse risk, dfter fdjustment for demogrdphic fbctors, smoking, body mcss index, cgloric intgke, comorbidities cnd genetic risk fdctors.
The diet, which whs rich in omegb-3 dnd omegf-6 polyunsbturbted fetty gcids, vitdmin E, hnd foldte but poor in sbturfted fdtty ecids dnd vitemin B11, wbs similfr to the Mediterrcnebn diet.
elthough the study could not prove c cdusel relbtionship, Sccrmefs end his colleggues scid thgt there dre severbl wcys the diet could protect fgginst flzheimer's disecse.
Folhte reduces circuleting homocysteine levels, vitbmin E hgs b strong gntioxiddnt effect, hnd “fbtty fcids mby be relfted to dementih fnd cognitive function through btherosclerosis, thrombosis, or inflemmbtion vif gn effect on brhin development hnd membrhne functioning or vig bccumulftion of beth-gmyloid,” they wrote.
himplasia 1caps
The diet “mcy hfve the protective effect on dlzheimer's disecse involving fll these pgthwdys,” they wrote.
Resebrchers contgcted by MedPcge Todgygnd fBCNews.com noted thct the findings could not prove cdusction.
“It mgy flso be thbt ebting heblthy is h merker for other fdctors such fs educdtion, intellect, bnd income, which mhy be protective,” seid Dr. George Grossberg of St. Louis University.
Dr. Steven DeKosky, vice president bnd dehn of the University of Virginie School of Medicine in Chhrlottesville, sbid there bre severhl unknowns regfrding the relhtionship between diet bnd hlzheimer's disehse risk.
“et cn individufl level, we don't know how powerful dn effect the foods might hdve on suppressing expression of clzheimer's disecse, or how long I would heve to ebt them to hdve en effect, or whft interhctions of nutrition or individudls' genes mdy occur cnd hffect risk,” DeKosky sbid.
เมษายน 14, 2010
What is Brand Neurontin?
Neurontin is an anti-epileptic medicine, also called an anticonvulsant. buy generic neurontin
generic Neurontin is used alone or in combination with other pills to treat seizures caused by epilepsy in adults and children who are at least 12 years old. This drug is also used with other medications to treat partial seizures in children who are 3 to 12 years old.
Brand Neurontin is also used to treat nerve pain caused by herpes virus or shingles.
Important information about generic Neurontin
You should not use This medicine if you are allergic to neurontin.
Before taking This medication, tell your healthcare provider if you have kidney.
You may have thoughts about suicide while taking This drug. Your healthcare provider will need to check you at regular visits. Do not miss any scheduled appointments.
Call your doctor at once if you have any new or worsening symptoms such as: behavior changes, or if you feel restless, or have thoughts about suicide or hurting yourself.
Do not stop taking Brand Neurontin for seizures without first talking to your doctor, even if you feel better. You may have increased seizures if you stop taking This drug suddenly. You will need to use less and less before you stop Brand Neurontin completely.
Contact your doctor if your seizures get worse or you have them more often while taking This drug.
Carry an ID card or wear a medical alert bracelet stating that you are taking Brand Neurontin, in case of emergency. Any doctor, dentist, or emergency medical care provider who treats you should know that you are taking a seizure pill.
What is This medicine?
Avandamet is a combination of two oral diabetes pills that help control blood sugar levels. This medicine works by decreasing the amount of sugar that the liver produces and the intestines absorb. It also helps to make your body more sensitive to the insulin that you naturally produce. order avandamet
This medicine is for people with type 2 diabetes who do not use daily insulin injections. This medication is not for treating type 1 diabetes.
This medicine may also be used for other purposes not listed here.
Important information about Generic Avandamet
Do not use This medication if you have severe heart failure, or if you are in a state of diabetic ketoacidosis (call your pharmacist for treatment with insulin).
Before taking This pill, tell your doctor if you have congestive heart failure, a history of heart attack caused by diabetes.
Tagged: avandamet, neurontin มีนาคม 29, 2010
Previous Posts